Job families and functions

Job families are groupings of roles with similar types of work or expertise, while functions refer to the broader organizational departments or areas they belong to, such as finance or HR. This enables alignment with business structure and strategic talent planning.

Titles

Titles are the formal names assigned to positions that reflect the role’s function and level within the organization. When used appropriately, titles will promote internal consistency, clarity, and external market alignment and help to avoid title inflation.

Title consolidation

Title consolidation is the process of reducing title proliferation by grouping similar roles under standardized, consistent titles. It involves grouping jobs with similar responsibilities, scope, and levels and assigning them a common standardized title, sometimes referred to as a job classification.

Pay equity analysis

Many states have rules and regulations designed to ensure that employees performing similar levels of work are paid the same. Pay equity analysis includes an additional review of job documentation to ensure that jobs performing substantially similar work are aligned at the same pay levels even if they don’t have the same job titles.

Standardized job descriptions

These are uniform documents outlining key duties, qualifications, reporting relationships, and competencies for each role. They provide the basis for job evaluation, FLSA classification, employee accommodations, benchmarking, performance expectations, and management.

Levels

Levels define the hierarchy and scope of roles within a job family, distinguishing jobs by complexity, responsibility, and impact. These are often numerical (e.g., Levels 1-5) or grouped by job bands (e.g., Support, Professional, Management, and Executive).

Job analysis

This is the process of analyzing the duties and responsibilities of a job to understand the full picture of the requirements of the role. Job analyses are often conducted with electronic questionnaires, desk audits, and interviews with employees and their managers.

Pay structures

A pay structure is a formal system of pay grades and ranges or steps that define how much an employee should be paid based on their job level, skill, experience, and market value as determined by the job analysis. These serve as a guide for making compensation decisions across an organization.

Competitive analysis/benchmarking

This is the process of evaluating how an organization’s job and pay levels compare to the external market, a crucial step in building a fair and competitive job architecture. It ensures alignment with what comparable organizations are offering.

Cost analysis

Cost analysis involves assessing the financial impact of compensation changes or job architecture implementation on current and future organizational budgets.

These elements create a unified structure that brings consistency and clarity, which informs HR operations and decision-making.

Implementing a thoughtful job architecture framework helps organizations achieve several important objectives. Internally, it aligns roles and responsibilities, simplifies organizational design, and enhances employee understanding of career progression opportunities. Externally, it ensures compensation programs are competitive and aligned with market benchmarks while supporting compliance with regulations related to pay transparency and pay equity.

Whether you are launching job architecture for the first time or retooling an outdated system, this step-by-step resource will provide a strategic foundation for success.

Creating a job architecture begins with a solid project framework. It is essential to define objectives that align with business goals. For instance, an organization may seek to reduce title proliferation, promote pay equity, or improve internal mobility. Defining these goals early helps establish focus and guide decisions while working out the details of the organization’s job architecture.

Stakeholder feedback is a crucial early step in the project management process that sets the stage for success. This phase begins by recognizing and involving various individuals or groups who will contribute insights, expertise, and resources throughout the project’s lifecycle. Typically, the project requires input from several key stakeholders, which might include the following:

• Executive sponsor: This is often the Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) who plays a significant role in championing the initiative at the executive level.
• The compensation or total rewards team: These teams bring substantial knowledge regarding employee compensation structures and benefits, ensuring that the project’s outcomes align with organizational compensation goals.
• Human resource business partners (HRBPs): HR Business Partners bring a deep understanding of the business unit’s structure, strategy, and people. They act as advisors and advocates for both HR and business leaders.
• Legal and compliance experts: These individuals are vital for helping to navigate the regulatory landscape and ensure the project adheres to all relevant laws and company policies.
• Business unit leaders: These team members contribute a perspective grounded in the organization’s operational realities and unique organizational challenges, providing valuable context for decision-making.
• People managers: Supervisors and managers who work directly with employees ensure that the framework is practical and considers the workforce’s day-to-day experiences.

By involving these diverse groups, the project framework becomes comprehensive and well-aligned with actual business needs, improving the chances of successful implementation and acceptance across the organization.

A detailed project plan should include milestones that mark significant progress points, deliverables that outline the expected outcomes, and a clear communication strategy to ensure all stakeholders are informed and engaged throughout the process. By having these elements in place, the initiative is more likely to remain on track and achieve its objectives effectively.

Before creating a structure, it’s important to understand what already exists. A job inventory includes collecting all current job documentation, job titles, organizational charts, and reporting lines within a company. This thorough review is not just a matter of paperwork; it often uncovers significant inconsistencies in how roles are defined and categorized across the organization.

For example, within a single company, it’s common to discover that similar roles may carry different titles that can vary widely from one department to another. In one department, a position might be designated as “Client Services Manager,” while in another, it could be termed “Customer Support Lead,” and in yet another, it might be referred to as “Account Coordinator.” Despite these varied titles, the core responsibilities and functions of these roles are often nearly identical, which can lead to misunderstandings about job expectations and responsibilities.

The job inventory process helps identify several key issues within the workforce. Firstly, it helps to pinpoint gaps in job descriptions; these are roles that either do not have any formal description or whose descriptions are outdated and no longer reflect the current expectations of the position. Secondly, it can uncover overlaps where multiple positions may have redundant responsibilities, leading to confusion and inefficiencies within teams. Lastly, it will highlight inconsistencies arising from having a wide variation in job titles or pay for similar work, which could contribute to employee dissatisfaction and potential turnover.

The insights gained from this inventory process are the foundation for organizations to build job families and levels. By categorizing roles into clear and coherent families, companies can create a more structured environment that facilitates career growth and better defines job responsibilities while maintaining internal equity and facilitating pay equity compliance. This structured approach also aligns roles with the company’s strategic objectives and enhances employee satisfaction by ensuring clearer paths for advancement and development.

Grouping jobs into logical families is the next step. Job families are clusters of roles that involve similar types of work or expertise. For example, the IT family might include disciplines such as Software Development, IT Support, and Systems Administration. Each discipline, in turn, may be broken into sub-families.

Establishing well-defined job families and sub-families creates a structured framework within the organization, significantly enhancing workforce planning processes. For example, as a company seeks to expand its data science capabilities, constructing a clear Analytics job family with specific, well-defined roles assists HR in finding and recruiting candidates and enables them to benchmark compensation and develop talent more systematically and with greater efficiency. This structured approach facilitates better alignment of talent development initiatives with the strategic goals of the organization, ensuring that the workforce is prepared to meet future challenges.

The adoption of consistent naming conventions for job titles cannot be overstated. Organizations should avoid ambiguous or overly casual designations such as “Sr. Marketing Ninja” or “Creative Rock Star” that can obscure the actual responsibilities and hierarchies of roles within the company. Instead, adopting transparent and standardized naming structures, such as “Marketing Specialist II” or “Creative Director,” clarifies expectations, helps maintain professional integrity, and facilitates better communication both internally and externally. Standardized job titles contribute to a more understandable organizational structure, making it easier for employees to navigate career paths and for HR to manage talent effectively across the organization.

Career levels serve as the backbone of job architecture, defining the hierarchy and progression within an organization. Each level is designed to represent a clearly defined scope of responsibility, which encompasses the degree of autonomy granted to the individual and the potential impact they can have on the organization.

For instance, a Level 1 role typically involves executing routine tasks closely monitored by supervisors, often requiring significant direction and oversight. This level primarily focuses on developing foundational skills and understanding the organizational processes.

In contrast, a Level 5 role carries substantial responsibilities, often requiring the individual to lead the development and implementation of business strategies. At this level, the professional exercises a high degree of autonomy and may have a significant influence on various aspects of the organization, shaping decisions that affect broad areas and driving overall business success.

A leveling matrix is often used to define criteria such as:

• Knowledge and skill requirements: Defines the depth and specialization of expertise expected at each level, distinguishing entry-level roles from advanced or strategic positions.
• Decision-making authority: Clarifies the scope and independence of decisions an employee is empowered to make, from following established protocols to setting organizational direction.
• Leadership responsibilities: Indicates expectations around managing people or projects, ranging from individual contributor roles to executive-level team oversight.
• Budget or team size managed: Quantifies managerial scope by detailing responsibility for financial resources or direct reports, which typically scales with job level.
• Impact on business outcomes: Measures how significantly the role influences organizational goals, from executing tasks with limited reach to shaping strategic business performance.

Establishing clear career pathways is crucial for fostering employee engagement and retention. These pathways can include vertical ladders for advancement, allowing employees to progress to higher positions within their field, and horizontal lattices that promote skill diversification across different roles. For example, a software engineer can vertically advance to positions such as senior engineer, lead engineer, and, ultimately, engineering manager. Alternatively, the engineer may choose to explore lateral opportunities, transitioning into roles like product management, which broadens their skill set and enhances their overall career development.

Defining roles and levels is a crucial step in the organizational structure, and standardized job descriptions help to synthesize this information effectively. A well-crafted job description should include the following elements:

• Overview of the position’s purpose: Defines the depth and specialization of expertise expected at each level, distinguishing entry-level roles from advanced or strategic positions.
• Decision-making authority: A clear statement that highlights the main objectives and goals of the role within the organization.
• Detailed key responsibilities: A comprehensive list of essential tasks and duties the position entails ensuring clarity on what is expected.
• Skills and qualifications required: Skills and qualifications required: Specific educational background, professional experience, and technical skills necessary for candidates to possess to succeed in the role.
• Reporting relationships: An outline of the organizational hierarchy, indicating how the position interacts with other roles, including supervisors and subordinates.
• Competencies and working conditions: Competencies and working conditions: A description of the soft skills needed, such as teamwork and problem-solving abilities, along with any physical or environmental conditions associated with the job.

Trüpp Tip: Learn how to write more effective job descriptions
This article provided by the consulting specialists at Trüpp provides practical information on how to write job descriptions.

Standardizing job descriptions ensures alignment with the company’s leveling framework and job families, but also aids in maintaining compliance with various employment laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This comprehensive approach enhances clarity and provides a strong foundation for employee evaluation and development.

Trüpp Tip: Scalable job description support
Trüpp offers job description services to ensure yours are scalable, accurate, and compliant, making it easier to manage updates over time.

Benchmarking roles against market data is essential for establishing competitive and equitable compensation strategies within an organization. To begin, select compensation surveys that are relevant to the organization’s specific industry, company size, and geographic location to ensure the data accurately reflects the market. Next, thoroughly map internal job positions to corresponding market matches, taking into account not only the job content, such as responsibilities and skill requirements, but also the job level, which can significantly impact salary expectations. This comprehensive approach helps organizations attract and retain top talent while maintaining equitable pay practices. For example, a Financial Analyst II in a mid-sized software company may benchmark at $85,000 in the Portland, OR metro area but at $95,000 in San Francisco, CA. Adjusting pay ranges based on geography and business strategy ensures you remain competitive while managing costs.

Learn more about pay differentials >>
This article provided by the compensation specialists at Trüpp offers breaks down pay differential strategies.

Utilizing job levels as a foundation for determining pay ranges significantly enhances compliance with pay equity regulations by eliminating subjective criteria in salary determination. This structured approach promotes fairness by ensuring that salaries are based on clearly defined levels of responsibility and skill and streamlines the process of updating pay structures. Instead of having to reassess individual roles each time a change is necessary, organizations can efficiently modify salary ranges based on established levels, simplifying the overall management of compensation.

Trüpp Tip: Precision insights through benchmarking
Trüpp offers tailored job benchmarking services, from a single position to your entire workforce, to help organizations align compensation with market standards.

Implementation of a new framework requires careful change management to ensure its success and sustainability within the organization. Begin the process by securing leadership buy-in; this is crucial as it sets the tone for the entire initiative. Using robust data analytics demonstrates the tangible business benefits of the new framework. For instance, present evidence shows how title consolidation and job leveling can significantly reduce administrative burdens and create clearer pathways for career development for employees, thus fostering a more efficient workplace.

Training managers is a critical step that should not be overlooked. It’s essential to equip them with the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively address employee inquiries, as well as to communicate the rationale behind the implemented changes clearly. Open and transparent communication with employees is vital in this process, as it helps build trust and minimize resistance to the changes. The messaging should highlight how the new organizational structure contributes to a more equitable workplace, clarifies career progression, and opens new opportunities for professional growth. Providing continuous feedback channels and support will further enhance acceptance and engagement from all stakeholders involved.

Job architecture should be viewed as a continuous, evolving framework rather than a onetime project. Deploy clear governance protocols that establish ownership of the framework, detail the process for making updates, and specify the frequency of reviews. A widely recommended practice is to conduct an annual review of job architecture in tandem with compensation planning cycles to ensure alignment with organizational goals.

As your organization expands, alterations in business strategies, advancements in technology, or fluctuations in market conditions should trigger modifications to job families, titles, or pay ranges. Implementing a well-documented change process is valuable for ensuring ongoing alignment between job architecture and the company’s strategic objectives, making it adaptable to change and effectively supporting talent management.

Trüpp Tip: Precision insights through benchmarking
Ongoing support for job architecture Trüpp provides ongoing compensation management to help organizations
maintain and evolve their job architecture, including market benchmarking and stakeholder education.